Retrospective study of comparison of clinical severity and outcome of hospitalised COVID-19 patients during the first and second waves of the pandemic in India.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical severity and outcome of hospitalised patients during the two waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in India. SETTING: A tertiary care referral hospital in South India. PARTICIPANTS: Symptomatic SARS CoV-2 reverse transcriptase PCR positive patients presenting to the emergency department during the two waves were recruited. The first wave spanned between April and December 2020 and the second wave between April and May 2021. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome of interest was mortality. Secondary outcomes included illness severity at presentation, need for oxygen therapy, non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and hospital or intensive care unit admission. RESULTS: The mean (SD) age of the 4971 hospitalised patients in the first wave was similar to the 2293 patients in the second wave (52.5±15.4 vs 52.1±15.1 years, p=0.37). When compared with the first wave, during the second wave, a higher proportion of patients presented with critical illness (11% vs 1.1%, p<0.001) and needed supplemental oxygen therapy (n=2092: 42.1% vs n=1459: 63.6%; p<0.001), NIV (n=643; 12.9% vs n=709; 30.9%; p<0.001) or inotropes/vasoactive drugs (n=108; 2.2% vs n=77: 3.4%; p=0.004). Mortality was higher during the second wave (19.2% vs 9.3%; p<0.001). On multivariable regression analysis, age >60 years (risk ratio, RR 2.80; 95% CI 2.12 to 3.70), D-dimer >1000 ng/mL (RR 1.34; 95% CI 1.15 to 1.55), treatment with supplemental oxygen (RR 14.6; 95% CI 8.98 to 23.6) and presentation during the second wave (RR 1.40; 95% CI 1.21 to 1.62) were independently associated with mortality. CONCLUSION: The second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in India appeared to be associated with more severe presentation and higher mortality when compared with the first wave. Increasing age, elevated D-dimer levels and treatment with supplemental oxygen were independent predictors of mortality.

Stenotrophomonas isolates in a tertiary care centre in South India.

PURPOSE: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an emerging multi-drug resistant pathogen increasingly isolated in India. This study aimed to identify patients from whom Stenotrophomonas maltophilia had been isolated and assess predictors of mortality in this population. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients with a positive culture for S. maltophilia over a 3-year period. Clinical details and laboratory results were assessed from hospital records. Bivariate and multivariate analysis was used to identify risk factors for mortality. RESULTS: One hundred and nineteen patients (mean age 48.6 years) were included in the study. Of these, 111 patients were hospitalized for at least 48 â€‹hours prior to culture and 98 were admitted in the intensive care unit. Bivariate analysis revealed multiple associations with mortality, including a background of renal, cardiac, autoimmune disease, recent carbapenam use and COVID-19 infection and increasing ventilatory requirement, lower PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratio, vasopressor use, thrombocytopenia, and hypoalbuminemia at the time of positive isolate. Multivariate analysis showed that autoimmune disease [OR 27.38; 95% CI (1.39-540)], a P/F ratio of less than 300 [OR 7.58; 95% CI (1.52-37.9)], vasopressor requirement [OR 39.50; 95% CI (5.49-284)] and thrombocytopenia [OR 11.5; 95% CI (2.04-65.0)] were statistically significantly associated with increased mortality, while recent surgery and receipt of antibiotics [OR 0.16; 95% CI (0.03-0.8)] targeted against S. maltophilia were associated with decreased mortality. CONCLUSION: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is primarily isolated in patients in the intensive care unit. In our study the need for vasopressors, autoimmune disease, lower P/F ratios and thrombocytopenia were associated with higher mortality. The association of targeted antibiotics with reduced mortality suggests that the pathogenic role of S. maltophilia should not be underestimated. This finding needs to be confirmed with larger, prospective studies.